I started writing this blog as an outlet many years ago as I navigated a mental health system with my daughter that has proven to be a challenge to say the least. The system has an infrastructure that is lacking cohesive care for patients, and the patient is treated with a medication based paradigm and medical model that has become the 'American Way'.
I have, over many years, met hundreds of psychiatric patients within hospital settings as a result of being with my daughter. I can safely say, that many complain about the medications and many tell me they cannot think on antipsychotics. I've witnessed forced injections, heard people sobbing and begging to get out,among many other sad and intense situations.
There are many readers of this blog that are what they describe themselves to be:
Psychiatric Survivors. These are the people who have scraped themselves up after being slammed down on psychiatric medications, or who have been locked inside psychiatric hospitals. Many are completely off of medications and successfully living a recovered life off of the medication-based paradigm.
Some write blogs, others leave comments on blogs. Many have and still suffer from the trauma induced upon them by the inpatient time. Many have body damage as a result of psychiatric medication use. Their voices are out there, and need to be heard.
Most of all, these people deserve respect.
They deserve dignity.
They deserve integrity.
They deserve honesty.
They deserve the truth.
Over time, as I wrote here about my daughter I began researching into the depths of how the system worked. It didn't take long to see a connect-the-dots setting that involved a corrupt pharmaceutical industry, with ties to the Key Opinion Leaders of Psychiatry. The information began to flow in with stories of fines from the Department of Justice for illegal marketing of the medications, the stories came in about the KOL's taking undisclosed money from pharmaceutical companies. The information over the years has evolved to become an inside look at how the world of Psychiatry works, and it is not a world that is conducive to the health and well-being of psychiatric patients in need.
Psychiatric patients are vulnerable people. In fact, I believe they are the most vulnerable people in society. They are at their most vulnerable, when they have had a break with reality. I say this based on what I have seen with my daughter. In her time of need, when she was not able to think for herself, or ask for informed consent, are times when she deserved respect, dignity and integrity from her doctors and those around her. She, instead like many others, was victim to lack of informed consent, given forced (against her will, being held down)injections of antipsychotics, and strapped tight to gurneys. Those days are now past. The pain and suffering and resulting trauma has not. She resides in a quiet world most of the time. Verbal days can be mixed with words we do not understand and mixed with memories. Sometimes, tears.
My daughter is a representative of the
Psychiatry Survivor. She has survived all of the trauma, and is here. She cannot write or speak in public. I can. I can represent what I have seen on her behalf. I can demand the dignity she so richly deserves. I can hold integrity, truth and honesty high as I do in my daily life.
----
Therefore, I feel I must present a few facts I have discovered that bother me. I'll be honest, it bothers me a lot. I have no agenda or witch hunt intentions. I shoot from the hip with honesty and I can no longer remain silent about what I feel people deserve:
Honesty, truth and integrity.
For the people who leave comments on doctor's blogs, for the readers who do not comment but are directly influenced by a doctor's opinion, for those who look up to doctors and base hope in ones they find who seem to speak to them for some reason. It is with my own burden that I present this about a blogging doctor who I wrote about in my previous
post title, and referenced as a Psychiatrist , regarding the
Psychiatric Times article on the Criticism of the DSM 5.The
Psychiatric Times describes the author, Dr.Steven Balt as a Psychiatrist, and author of the
Thought Broadcast blog.
Another 2011 article
by William Heisel has a Q and A with Dr.Balt where he asks:
Q: How could you work as a practicing psychiatrist without finishing your residency?
A: "There’s nothing to keep me from practicing medicine. I do have a medical license and a DEA license and can prescribe medications. But, to work in most settings, you have to have malpractice coverage or be board-certified or board-eligible. At this clinic, I was able to get onto their malpractice policy."
In my opinion, there needs to be a correction on the Psychiatric Times article, stating Balt is a psychiatrist, when in fact it should say 'resident', because patients and readers deserve the truth,honesty and transparency.
As for the transparency and full disclosure on Balt's blog--that is ultimately up to him as to how he portrays himself to his readers and commenters.
----
12.23.11
*Addendum Dr. Steve Balt has responded via email and gave permission to post his reflections on this post, which I appreciate.
" Hi Stephany,
I feel compelled to respond because you and I have communicated regularly in the past, I know that we're on the "same side of the fence" with respect to our views on psychiatry, and you raise some valid points.
First, with respect to the Psychiatric Times article, I had no say in how I was named or cited (or even the picture-- I don't know where they found that!). They asked for contributions offering various viewpoints on DSM-5. I had written a recent blog post which received a lot of feedback (not all positive), and I emailed it to them. They posted it without asking me for my title, disclosures, etc., even though I offered to provide such information.
Second, getting to the major point of your argument-- i.e., that I am a psychiatry resident. That is correct, I'm completing my final six months (out of 4 years total) at UCLA-Kern Medical Center. As you know, I spent three years at Stanford, then took time off to deal with my own personal issues, detailed in Heisel's articles. And while these issues had nothing to do with patient care, they made it difficult for me to find a place to resume my training when I did return to practice.
Nevertheless, I have been fortunate to work successfully in a variety of settings in the last three years. And as you and I have discussed, this has opened my eyes to some of the misrepresentation, pseudoscience, waste, and outright abuse that takes place in everyday psychiatric practice. This was also the impetus for me to start my own blog in 2010. I don't mean at all to suggest that the psychiatrists I've worked with are bad people, but rather that the field is built on such shaky ground and is so ripe for abuse (sometimes inadvertently so) by doctors, patients, and the public-assistance systems in which I have primarily worked in the last four years. Much of what I experience and observe leaves me shaking my head, and I often wonder whether psychiatry is doing any good for the people who come to us for help.
I would never have developed such a strong opinion had I NOT taken time away from a place like Stanford and worked as a psychiatrist "in the trenches." Furthermore, I believe that my own experiences as a patient (with a history of at least five different medications, two long-term treatment programs, and numerous psychiatrists and therapists) give me a certain outlook that I never would have developed as a "mainstream" psychiatrist. Finally, my 2-year relationship (and recent marriage) to a drug rep offers yet another perspective on the overmedicalized nature of my field.
I often comment to my friends that, had I stayed at Stanford, I would probably have become, by now, one of those "key opinion leaders" paid by Pharma to give dinner talks and to speak at meetings like the APA about "new medications in bipolar disorder" or something like that. After all, that's one of the reasons I chose that program for my training.
However, what I've learned in the last 5+ years has been FAR more informative regarding what psychiatry is *really* all about, and, more importantly, what patients experience when they come to someone like me for guidance, support, compassion, and advice. If the fact that I'm lacking six months of residency training means I'm not a "real" psychiatrist, so be it. But I'll constantly stand by what I write, say, and do for my patients, because it seems so rare amongst my colleagues-- especially the more "certified" ones-- and I think my profession is due for a change. "
Steve Balt