Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Senator Grassley et al file amendment to combat widespread use of antipsychotics in nursing homes

Via Senator Charles Grassley Kohl, Grassley and Blumenthal Seek to Cut Misuse of Antipsychotics

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Herb Kohl, D-Wis., Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., today filed an amendment seeking to combat the costly, widespread and inappropriate use of antipsychotics in nursing homes.

“The overuse of antipsychotics is a common and well-recognized problem that puts frail elders at risk and costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars each year,” Kohl said. “We need a new policy that helps to ensure that these drugs are being appropriately used to treat people with mental illnesses, not used to curb behavioral symptoms of Alzheimer’s or other dementias.”

“This amendment responds to alarming reports about the use of antipsychotic drugs with nursing home residents,” Grassley said. “It’s intended to empower these residents and their loved ones in the decisions about the drugs prescribed for them.”

“This measure is responsive to mounting evidence that antipsychotics are being misused and overused in the nursing homes we trust to care for our loved ones,” Blumenthal said. “The amendment will do what is necessary to curb this deeply concerning practice, putting the power to make key health care decisions back into the appropriate hands and eliminating unnecessary costs to taxpayers.”

The amendment to S. 3187, the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act would require the Health and Human Services Secretary to issue standardized protocols for obtaining informed consent, or authorization from patients or their designated health care agents or legal representatives, acknowledging possible risks and side effects associated with the antipsychotic, as well as alternative treatment options, before administering the drug for off-label use.

While the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved antipsychotic drugs to treat an array of psychiatric conditions, numerous studies conducted during the last decade have concluded that these medications can be harmful when used by frail elders with dementia who do not have a diagnosis of serious mental illness. In fact, the FDA issued two “black box” warnings citing increased risk of death when these drugs are used to treat elderly patients with dementia.
Last year, the Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General (HHS OIG) issued a report showing that over a six-month period, 305,000, or 14 percent, of the nation’s 2.1 million elderly nursing home residents had at least one Medicare or Medicaid claim for atypical antipsychotics.

The HHS OIG also found that 83 percent of Medicare claims for atypical antipsychotic drugs for elderly nursing home residents were associated with off-label conditions and that 88 percent were associated with a condition specified in the FDA box warning. Further, it showed that more than half of the 1.4 million claims for atypical antipsychotic drugs, totaling $116.5 million, failed to comply with Medicare reimbursement criteria.

The amendment also calls for a new prescriber education program to promote high-quality, evidence-based treatments, including non-pharmacological interventions. The prescriber education programs would be funded through settlements, penalties and damages recovered in cases related to off-label marketing of prescription drugs.


Tuesday, May 22, 2012

" If you engage in corrupt behavior, there will be no long term consequences.” Charles Nemeroff receives NIH grant money--what?

Charles Nemeroff news

" If you engage in corrupt behavior, there will be no long term consequences.” says Paul Thacker, ex- Charles Grassley and POGO investigator in the article at
Pharmalot Nemeroff Gets His First NIH Grant In Three Years:

" “This shows that the NIH is simply incapable of handling conflict of interest problems in an adult, professional manner,” Paul Thacker, a former invesigator for US Senator Chuck Grassley, who ran the Senate probe, tells us. “Nemeroff is back on the federal dole because he’s made friends with NIH hierarchy. Not because his research is critical to public health.The NIH just sent a message to all federally funded researchers. If you engage in corrupt behavior, there will be no long term consequences.”

Sunday, May 20, 2012

A parent's worst nightmare--tragic death of son by suicide after taking antidepressant Lexapro, Cipralex, Escitalopram


About 7 minutes into this video, Nancy McCartney is interviewed about the death of her son, Brennan from suicide after being prescribed antidepressant Cipralex (Escitalopram)(Lexapro in U.S.) in Canada. Nancy tells me on twitter, that Ontario coroner has refused to do any toxicology. The interview also features Dr. David Healy.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

It's here: under the tongue "Ambien", mint flavored--take in bed! being marketed by the maker of OxyContin

This is a great article (linked below) by MARIANNE SKOLEK, COLUMNIST FOR AMERICAN NEWS REPORT. Her bio in the article states she is a parent a daughter lost to OxyContin in 2002, and she writes from the perspective of an activist fueled by anguish and outrage--

Intermezzo is a sub-lingual (under the tongue) version of the popular sleeping aid Ambien (has the key ingredient zolpidem, and, according to the article, is being marketed by Purdue Pharma, the same drug company in the news for the pain killer OxyContin (see William Heisel's story--Bioethics Center with Money Ties to Big Pharma Has Habit of Downplaying Painkiller Risks.

The pill is mint flavored and designed to market to people who wake up in the middle of the night and can't go back to sleep. It's designed to be taken while lying in bed. The drug (Intermezzo) was approved by the FDA after just a few trials on a few (300+)people.

Take a look at Marianne Skolek's article--Intermezzo: A Nightmare Drug for Insomniacs?.

Mother, reporter, activist: Marianne Skolek's testimony to the U.S. Senate 2007--"My name is Marianne Skolek.

.."I had a beautiful 29 year old daughter named Jill. She had the misfortune of being prescribed OxyContin in January 2002 and was killed on April 29, 2002. Jill left behind her son Brian who was 6 years old at the time of his mom's death. Brian is with me in the Senate today.

Why did a $9 billion privately held pharmaceutical corporation take the life of my precious daughter? My work against Purdue Pharma for the past 5 years initially focused on J. David Haddox, dentist turned psychiatrist and Senior Medical Director of Purdue Pharma. I also focused on Robin Hogen, former Public Relations spokesman for Purdue Pharma." (read the rest at the link).

Thursday, May 17, 2012

Risk of cancer increases by 19% from use of benzodiazepines

STUDY: Benzodiazepine Use Possibly Increases Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan

"Objective: To evaluate the possible association between benzodiazepine use and subsequent cancer risk in Taiwan.

Method: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we used data from 1996 to 2000 from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance system to investigate the possible association between benzodiazepine use and cancer risk. The exposure cohort (mean age = 47.9 years, standard deviation [SD] = 17.3 years) consisted of 59,647 patients with benzodiazepine use. Each patient from the exposure cohort was randomly frequency-matched by age and sex to a person from the cohort with no benzodiazepine exposure (the comparison group; mean age = 46.4 years, SD = 17.8 years). Each study subject was followed until a diagnosis of cancer was made (according to ICD-9-CM) or until the time the subject was censored for loss to follow-up, death, or termination of insurance—or to the end of 2009. A Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was conducted to estimate the effects of benzodiazepine use on cancer risk.

Results: In the group with benzodiazepine use, the overall risk of developing cancer was 19% higher than in the group without benzodiazepine exposure, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.19; 99.6% CI, 1.08–1.32). With regard to individual types of cancer, the risk of developing liver cancer (HR = 1.45; 99.6% CI, 1.10–1.90), prostate cancer (HR = 1.72; 99.6% CI, 1.10–2.70), and bladder and kidney cancer (HR = 1.76; 99.6% CI, 1.16–2.67) was significantly higher for the benzodiazepine cohort.

Conclusions: This population-based study has shed light on a possible relationship between benzodiazepine use and increased cancer risk. Further large, thorough investigations are needed to confirm these findings."

Monday, May 14, 2012

A Vision for Transformation: Mental Health Freedom and Recovery Act by Duane Sherry

VIA the Mad in America blog, A Vision for Transformation: Mental Health Freedom and Recovery Act Duane Sherry voices an Op-Ed which includes a link to his blog Discover and Recover where he has written "Mental Health Freedom and Recovery Act":

Mental Health Freedom and Recovery Act--includes informed consent, recovery model,psychiatric drug withdrawal centers and more go take a look at both, this is the vision that people need to have to shift the current medical treatment model for psychiatry which is based solely on psychiatric medications for treatment and long-term care for psychiatric issues.

Saturday, May 12, 2012

Allen Frances:"Psychiatric diagnosis is simply too important to be left exclusively in the hands of psychiatrists"

Allen Frances on the DSM 5

via OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR-Diagnosing the D.S.M.-By ALLEN FRANCES

"All mental-health disciplines need representation — not just psychiatrists but also psychologists, counselors, social workers and nurses. The broader consequences of changes should be vetted by epidemiologists, health economists and public-policy and forensic experts. Primary care doctors prescribe the majority of psychotropic medication, often carelessly, and need to contribute to the diagnostic system if they are to use it correctly. Consumers should play an important role in the review process, and field testing should occur in real life settings, not just academic centers.

Psychiatric diagnosis is simply too important to be left exclusively in the hands of psychiatrists. They will always be an essential part of the mix but should no longer be permitted to call all the shots.

Allen Frances, a former chairman of the psychiatry department at Duke University School of Medicine, led the task force that produced D.S.M.-4."
Allen Frances, NYT

Friday, May 11, 2012

Cause of Death: Unknown Website Announcement at Occupy the APA, May 5, 2012

Andrew Grant


"
Andrew Grant, the Berlin, Germany-based producer of a documentary for Norwegian filmmaker Anniken Hoel titled, CAUSE OF DEATH: UNKNOWN, announces a soon-to-be launched website where people can report on deaths and harm caused by psychiatric drugs at Occupy the American Psychiatric Association, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, May 5, 2012."

APA 2012 a social media extravaganza!


The twitter hashtag
#APAAM12 used for the American Psychiatric Association's annual meeting 2012 in Philadelphia was a fast-moving bonanza of information coming from psychiatrists, social media hounds, and APA protesters and more. At the beginning of the meeting there were tweets about the protesters:

There was chatter by psychiatrists, such as Dr. Bob Hsiung, a long time Internet user and creator of "Psycho-Babble" site

There were journalists writing about the DSM-5 who were in attendance at the APA meeting and that writer walked out of a symposium:

"“Totally deceptive,” I said. I swung my backpack over one shoulder and walked out of the room." wrote Ferris Jabr from Scientific American.

There was a workshop given by psychiatrists on the public image of psychiatry, where Dr. Bob used real-time tweets as part of his presentation in his slide presentation:

"We Have Seen Psychiatry’s Public Image and It Is Ours "

There were cartoon commentaries

And there was something unexpected, and unique to the conversation between Psychiatrist's and critics that happened:Dr.Bob shows the love to pharma-psychiatry critic @writewithStan where upon reading that, I exclaimed, "Now I've seen it all!"

For a great round-up and wrap up by the wise and retired psychiatrist 1 Boring Old Man, go HERE where he takes apart the DSM-5 topic piece by piece.The chimp image above depicting the DSM-5 task force and the cartoon was created by writewithstan who never fails to inject humor into these discussions!

Last but not least, this was also a hashtag on twitter where I found via Dr.Steve Daviss, the author of an interesting article on Zoloft and cell eating (autophagy) by yeast. This was slightly confusing as to how it (the info from the study)applies to humans, so Dr.Daviss asked the author to clarify which he did, and you can read the author's answer here.


BY being part of the #APAAM12 hashtag and reading it for days, I was able to keep a pulse on the happenings, where there were lots of "Dollars for Docs" KOLs tweeted about when they were giving their KOL talks to attendees, there were tweets from pharma cos, tweets from protesters of the APA, and lots of social media contacts to be made and observed.

I feel the use of social media this way is a positive one where all voices can be heard, and if "psychiatry" was truly listening, they would use this tool to their advantage, to keep a pulse on what the outside world is saying about their profession. This is what Dr. Bob seemed to do.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

If you watch or listen to anything today, let it be this

If you listen and watch anything today let it be this:

Jim Gottstein news interview "Mind over Meds" Jim Gottstein, attorney who brought Zyprexa docs to public Gottstein, on Alaska TV news, discussing his recovery from a psychotic break, he is inspirational in so many ways.


Internal ZYprexa documents prove Lilly marketed the antipsychotic Zyprexa knowing it could cause diabetes and weight gain.

Tuesday, May 01, 2012

Father and son: medication, court-ordered



Film,
"That's Crazy" link here:from the site:

"Eric, a genetics major, and his father, a doctor living in Madison, Wisconsin never imagined they would challenge the mental health system. But when Eric, diagnosed as schizophrenic, decided to refuse his medications because they made him feel worse, the county issued a set of court orders that allowed police to pick him up and take him to a local hospital to be force medicated. Eric’s decision to refuse involuntary treatment with the help of his family triggers a series of personal, medical and legal battles that are captured by everybody involved as the events take place in real time. Eric's goal - to try a talking based treatment that has the highest success rate for psychosis in the world. Leading mental health activists and allies such as David Oaks and Robert Whitaker explore the science and the ideas behind the movement that believes people like Eric have a right to a voice and a choice in their treatment. Stylized verite reveals the story - animation by Em Cooper illustrates the inner experience."

Monday, April 30, 2012

APA 2012 Dr. Daniel Carlat and the Shrink Rap bloggers: "gaining control of our specialty's public image"

What's wrong with the medical model of mental health care in America? Lists like these of doctor's pharmaceutical financial disclosures in the APA meeting in Philly 2012


Flip through the book--Shrink Rap bloggers are giving a panel talk with Dr. Daniel Carlat and Dr Steve Balt titled, " Psychiatrists and the new media--gaining control of our specialty's public image" (page 149)and other interesting psychiatry tidbits.


I wonder how they will decide to gain control of psychiatry's public image?

Monday, April 23, 2012

TEDxColumbus - Suzanne Beachy - What's Next For The Truth

TEDxColumbus - Suzanne Beachy - What's Next For The Truth



I discovered this link to Suzanne Beachy's candid Tedx talk video at the Mad in America blog in this post titled, "I Don’t Believe in Mental Illness, Do You?" by Michael Cornwall.

Saturday, April 21, 2012

How much is this going to cost?

With all of the talk of health care reform and insurance, it's important to hear from those who have limited income, fixed income, no income; no insurance, no employment.

Life, sickness and health still happens!

When it comes to health care it seems it is the one thing Americans do not question until they are without health insurance or employment. Having medical insurance can "afford" a person care in the health system, yet no one questions with "How much will this cost?" when a doctor gives a list of blood work, or other items that need to be done.

When I was about to lose what I call "have by default" health insurance due to the finalization of a divorce, I began to ask that question. I was being treated for bronchitis, and the doctor was concerned for my health due to the stress of the impending loss of my home. I was blunt and told her I could not afford her care after the divorce was final, and I wanted to know how much it would cost me to walk in the door for that very appointment if I had to pay upfront and not a co-pay. What many people need to understand is that when on a fixed income or being low-income, a person often cannot afford co-pays or any other expense added to their budget for the month. My co-pay at the time was $30.00 and the insurance company was known to not cover all tests or treatments 100%.

When a person has a low-income or fixed income, those bills that come in the mail can be financially devastating as well as extremely stressful. After having so many people harassing me when my house was in foreclosure, I opted out of any tests or care that would come with an added balance to pay out of pocket, because that was worse.

How much would her visit have cost me without insurance? over $200 dollars and that was a cautious estimate because they told me they cannot say the total until the doctor completes the exam. They offered a discount "for cash paying patients without insurance" and that at 50% off was still too much for my budget to handle.

I recently phoned a few outpatient "urgent" care clinics and the over 100 dollar fee seems to be the going rate, again they tell over the phone, that they cannot say how much it will cost in the end. That right there makes the decision to forego a check-up or other reason to visit the clinic doctor. It's unattainable the same as any other purchase outside of my budget would be.

I believe people should be able to ask "How much will this cost?" and be given a universal chart of fees across the board.

If one has insurance the chart will list going rates of totals after that company pays its share and if its cash-and-carry-services the cost will be listed item by item for tests or procedures. We haggle over prices with car dealers, we look for bargains at furniture warehouses, we shop for groceries with an eye for what's on sale, we clip coupons.

Why can't we be that savvy with our health care services?

The test I asked how much would it cost? a vitamin D deficiency blood test that sounded like a test my (then) insurance company may not approve. I asked the gals at the blood work lab, and another patient commented it was costly. No one could give me a basic price sheet, my health was not in any emergent danger, so I opted out. I made sure to tell the doctor. She had no specific reason it seems to order the test, maybe a small one, but clearly nothing to be alarmed about, and I cannot afford that kind of reckless abandon with my budget.

No one should waste their dollars that way. We hear all of the time about patients receiving bills with high charges for ridiculous items, some for services never given, or like me once receiving an $8000 dollar bill for an ER trip for pneumonia. Medical providers are the worst for sending unpaid bills to collections, I have experienced that also.

Health care in America for me right now is living on a wing and a prayer that I remain healthy while in pursuit of a new career and health insurance as a result.

The "free clinic" is open with limited hours and serves approximately 20 people who have lined up hours before opening--the rest are turned away. That is my health care option right now without the cash to pay for health services at an "urgent" care clinic.

What if I needed surgery? what about cancer screening? preventative care? Public agencies are loaded with red-tape and paperwork. If a health crisis happens, it is impossible to find help from a public agency in time for the care needed. I have been told to "go to an ER" by doctors and the free clinic staff.



That is why America's Emergency Departments are being used for health care from uninsured citizens.

What can be done?